Legal Opinion

Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. Agency T70772; CA A131207; SC S055231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Petitioner Necanicum Investment Company seeks review of a final order of the Employment Department (department), concluding that petitioner’s payments to members of its board of directors for directors’ fees constitute wages that are subject to state unemployment taxes. The Court of Appeals affirmed the order, concluding that corporate directors, by setting corporate policy and providing governance, were in effect “employed” by petitioner and, thus, the payments constituted wages subject to state unemployment taxes. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Dept., 214 Or App 385, 164 P3d 1197…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Astleford v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  2. Employment Departmet v. National Maintenance Contractors of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Gross v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Broadway Cab LLC v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API