Legal Opinion

Marret v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1935No. 41887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge

The plaintiffs bring this suit to recover just compensation for the alleged taking by the defendant of its lands and buildings erected on the south bank of the Ohio River about six miles above Louisville, Ky. It appears that in 1921 W. F. Woodruff was the owner of a tract of land con*10sisting of about 91 acres bordering on the Ohio Eiver. The descriptions in the original grants give the east and west boundaries as extending to the “bank” of the Ohio River, with the northern boundary following the meanders of the river. The fast land of plaintiffs was at an elevation above mean sea level of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Kelley's Creek & Northwestern Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Marks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. The Confederated Tribes Of The Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API