Legal Opinion

Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 19, 1998No. 93-654LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before this court on the parties cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The plaintiffs are the alleged equitable and legal title holders of 50.7 acres of real property primarily (with the exception of 1.4 acres) existing as submerged land below the mean high water mark (49.3 acres) located in the City of Riviera Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. The plaintiffs filed a complaint1 against the *342United States seeking compensation in excess of $10,000,000.00 for an…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API