Legal Opinion

The Confederated Tribes Of The Colville Reservation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 17, 1992No. 90-5099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

964 F.2d 1102

The CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF the COLVILLE RESERVATION,

Colville, Lake, Sanpoil-Nespelem, Okanogan, Methow,

Columbia, Wenatchee, Chelan, Entiat, Palus, and Joseph's

Band of the Nez Perce Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-5099.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

April 29, 1992.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1992.

Harry R. Sachse, Sonosky, Chambers & Sachse, Washington, D.C., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Anne D. Noto and I.S. Weissbrodt.

Andrew C. Mergen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young-Montenay, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Remediation Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API