Legal Opinion
Unistar Properties, LLC v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 18, 2009No. SC 18321PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Unistar Properties, LLC, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its appeal from the denial of its application for a wetlands permit by the named defendant, 2 the conservation and inland wetlands commission (commission) of the town of Putnam (town), in connection with a proposed subdivision on its property. The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the commission properly denied the plaintiffs application for a wetlands permit as incomplete because it was missing certain information, including a sufficiently detailed wildlife…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. OvechkaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Red 11, LLC v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Jackson, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Three Levels Corp. v. Conservation Commission of ReddingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.