Legal Opinion
Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 20, 2009No. AC 29092PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this case, we address the limitations of the statutory farming exemption to town inland wetlands regulations. The plaintiff, Red 11, LLC, doing business as Twin Oak Farms, appeals from the judgments of the trial court dismissing the administrative appeals from the decisions of the named defendant, the conservation commission of the town of Fairfield (commission), 1 to uphold three cease and desist orders. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) dismissed its appeals because the commission lacked jurisdiction to uphold the cease and desist orders,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cantonbury Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Local Land Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Conservation Commission of Fairfield v. Red 11, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Indian Land Co. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.