Legal Opinion

Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2011No. H034994PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*78Opinion

McADAMS, J.

At issue in this appeal is a civil penalty, assessed under Labor Code section 226.3, for appellant’s failure to provide itemized wage statements to all of its employees as statutorily required. Appellant unsuccessfully challenged the penalty below, first at an administrative hearing and later in the trial court, arguing that its noncompliance was inadvertent within the meaning of the statute and that respondent erred in determining otherwise. Appellant renews those arguments here.

Interpreting the pertinent statutory language as a matter of first impression, we conclude that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Wasatch Property Management v. DegrateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Willner v. Manpower Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Soto v. Motel 6 Operating, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Lopez v. Friant & Assocs., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Raines v. Coastal Pac. Food Distribs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API