Legal Opinion
Soto v. Motel 6 Operating, L.P.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 2016No. D069403PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
Lidia Soto sued her former employer, Motel 6 Operating, L.P. (Motel), alleging Motel violated Labor Code section 226, subdivision (a) 1 by failing to include the monetary amount of accrued vacation pay in its employees’ wage statements. Soto filed the action in her individual capacity and on behalf of all aggrieved workers under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) (§ 2698 et seq.).
The court sustained Motel’s demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm. Section 226, subdivision (a) does not require employers to include the monetary value of accrued paid…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Maldonado v. Epsilon Plastics, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Raines v. Coastal Pac. Food Distribs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.