Legal Opinion
Lopez v. Friant & Assocs., LLC
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 26, 2017No. A148849PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, J.
*776Plaintiff Eduardo Lopez filed this action seeking recovery of civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General *2Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code,1 § 2698 et seq. ) for his employer's failure to include required information on itemized wage statements. The trial court granted summary judgment in the employer's favor on the basis that the uncontroverted evidence showed the employer's omission was not knowing or intentional within the meaning of section 226, subdivision (e)(1) (section 226(e)(1)). Because plaintiff's claim for civil penalties is governed by section 2699 and not section…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Raines v. Coastal Pac. Food Distribs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Khan v. Dunn-Edwards Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Donohue v. Amn Servs., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.