Legal Opinion
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1988No. 17059PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
This appeal arises from the Cibola County District Court’s stipulated settlement order entered on January 29, 1987. The Navajo Tribe of Indians (Tribe) appeals, alleging that it never consented to the settlement agreement and therefore should not be bound by it. We affirm.
FACTS
The Tribe filed suit against Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. and General Motors Corporation (defendants), alleging breach of contract and conversion of monies for vehicles purchased by the Tribe. Trial was scheduled for June 30, 1986. A month before trial, the district court scheduled a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Szymkowski v. SzymkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Segura v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Morris M. Glazer v. J. C. Bradford and Company, a Partnership, J. C. Bradford and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Makins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Macias v. New Mexico Department of LaborDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Builders Contract Interiors, Inc. v. Hi-Lo Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jarita Mesa Livestock Grazing Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.