Morris M. Glazer v. J. C. Bradford and Company, a Partnership, J. C. Bradford and Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The decision in this case is controlled by the established principle of Georgia law that a client is bound by his attorney’s agreement to settle a lawsuit, even though the attorney may not have had express authority to settle, if the opposing party was unaware of any limitation on the attorney’s apparent authority. Thus, in this suit for brokerage commissions, the district court correctly entered summary judgment for defendants who had reached an agreed settlement with plaintiff’s attorney, even though there was a substantial factual issue as to whether the plaintiff had authorized his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Keithley Edwards v. Born, Inc. Appeal of Keithley Edwards and Edith EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Village of Kaktovik v. WattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Terrain Enterprises, Inc. v. The Western Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Hayes v. Nat'l Services IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.