Legal Opinion
Harrah State Bank v. School District No. 70
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 15, 1915No. 3845PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by School District No. 70, Oklahoma County, against the Harrah State Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Defendant in error commenced this action against plaintiff in error to recover the balance of a deposit alleged to be due from the bank. The answer of the bank admitted the deposit, but pleaded, as a counterclaim or offset, a certain written order in words and figures as follows:, “Harrah, Okla., 1-20-10.
“To the Honorable School Board of School District No. 70, of Harrah, Oklahoma: Please pay to the Harrah State Bank, of Harrah, Oklahoma, $3,500.00, as estimates are made by the architect, and comes due according to contract on school building.
“[Signed] W. A- Jones.”
“We, the undersigned,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Gillette, Libby v. Murphy, Carroll, BroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Bentley v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Town & Land Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tudor v. American Investment Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Wiggins v. SterneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- O'Neill v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.