Legal Opinion

Klaus v. Fleming

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1956No. 36946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by Frank N. Fleming against F. L. Klaus and ■ John Chronister, d/b/a Klaus Radio and Television, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the alleged result of the defendant’s failure to furnish him proper equipment with which to perform his job. During trial the action was dismissed as to John Chronister and he is not a party to this appeal. The case was tried to a jury who returned a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. The defendant, F. L. Klaus, appeals.

The defendant argues his appeal under the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mason v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Logan v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Anthony v. ColvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Sellars v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Atlas Life Insurance Company v. EastmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Ritter v. Perma-Stone CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Shelton v. TapleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API