Legal Opinion
Rothe v. United Medical Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P.J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 13, 2003, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was not entitled to an award of benefits for the period of March 10, 2002 through September 18, 2002.
On February 5, 1999, claimant, a physician, slipped while descending a set of stairs where he worked injuring his left foot and ankle. He filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits and a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) established the case for a work-related injury to the left foot. Thereafter, the WCLJ expanded the claim to include an injury to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Mercio v. Globe Protection, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Schneider v. Buffalo Crushed Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Claim of Kwintner v. Madamoiselle PersonnelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by10 opinions
- Claim of Rothe v. United Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Grant v. Niagara Mohawk Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Valentin v. THB Intermediaries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Cary v. Salem Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of Scheriff v. Wichmann Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.