Legal Opinion
Claim of Rothe v. United Medical Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 2005PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 29, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant voluntarily withdrew from the labor market.
The underlying facts of this claim for workers’ compensation *1094benefits are set forth in a prior decision of this Court (2 AD3d 1264 [2003]) and will not be repeated here. Currently at issue is a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board which reversed the determination of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge that claimant had demonstrated an attachment to the labor market subsequent to September 18, 2002.
Initially, the Board’s decision…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Beehm v. Educational Opportunity CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rothe v. United Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Johnson v. Onondaga Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Ennist v. Texaco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Walby v. Volt Information ScienceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burns v. VarrialeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Claim of Peck v. James Square Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Pravato v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Kucuk v. Hickey Freeman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Smith v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.