Legal Opinion

Claim of Kwintner v. Madamoiselle Personnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Mugglin, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 15, 2001, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a compensable injury.

Claimant filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits after she suffered a mental breakdown allegedly as a result of her employer’s “verbal tirade” on April 18, 1996. The employer controverted the claim. Thereafter, various hearings were held during which the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) requested that claimant submit prima facie medical evidence of a causally related psychiatric injury. When claimant failed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of the Estate of Hertz v. Gannett Rochester NewspapersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Claim of Cartwright v. Onondaga News AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Claim of Cutting v. Richard W. Nezelek, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rothe v. United Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API