Legal Opinion

Claim of Scheriff v. Wichmann Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 9, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant did not sustain a further causally related disability.

After sustaining work-related injuries to his left shoulder and left elbow in April 2001, claimant applied for and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits. Following hearings and the receipt of medical evidence relating to this and three earlier established claims for injuries sustained in 1992,1995 and 2000, the Workers’ Compensation Board declined to direct apportionment between the injuries and closed all claims…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Naylon v. Erie County Highway DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Rothe v. United Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Claim of Ceselka v. Kingsborough Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Claim of Valentin v. THB Intermediaries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Claim of Smith v. Community Resource CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Tames v. New York Medical CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Claim of Fallon v. Syracuse City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Kamrowski v. Vestal Nursing CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Matter of Hedges v. Scandia Realty, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API