Legal Opinion

Van Meter v. Van Meter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1983No. 66938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal, the only issue is whether the district court erred in refusing to dismiss a claim alleging intentional infliction of physical and emotional distress caused by the defendant’s “seduction” of the plaintiff’s former husband, in view of our decision in Fundermann v. Michelson, 304 N.W.2d 790 (Iowa 1981) (abolishing the claim of alienation of affections). We affirm.

Our “notice pleading” rule requires only a “short and plain statement of the claim”; it does not require pleading of facts. Iowa R.Civ.P. 69(a). In order to sustain a motion to dismiss for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amsden v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Fundermann v. MickelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Giltner v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Lamantia v. SojkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Glass v. Minnesota Protective Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Schmidt v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Dunn v. Rose Way, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Quinn v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API