Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1983No. 69569PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for plaintiffs’ alleged failure to properly plead an abuse of process claim. We conclude that plaintiffs’ petition sufficiently stated an abuse of process claim in compliance with the “notice pleading” requirements of Iowa R.Civ.P. 69(a). Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.

The record for purposes of this appeal is very brief. Plaintiffs filed a petition on August 6, 1982. The petition consisted of two divisions. Division I was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Soike v. Evan Matthews and Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Gosha v. WollerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Sarvold v. DodsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Aalfs v. AalfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Munz v. ParrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Northrup v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Waits v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. Rieff v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Adam v. Mt. Pleasant Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API