Legal Opinion

Fundermann v. Mickelson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 1981No. 65064PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

We have become convinced that there is inherent and fatal contradiction in the term “alienation of affections.” The alienation belies the affection. Suits for alienation are useless as a means of preserving a family. They demean the parties and the courts. We abolish such a right of recovery and, hence, reverse and set aside the trial court’s judgment.

It is scarcely necessary to relate the facts. As is typical, there was ample defense evidence that the marriage between the plaintiff and his former wife, Susan, had deteriorated to a point of no return long prior to defendant’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Bierkamp v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Kersten Co., Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Wyman v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Goetzman v. WichernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Weitl v. MoesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API