State ex rel. Taro v. City of Everett
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish” county, Bell, J., entered July 6, 1917, granting a writ of mandamus to compel a city council to enforce an ordinance, upon sustaining a demurrer to the answer.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of Snohomish county, granting a *562peremptory writ of mandamus against the city council of the city Everett compelling that body to put in force an ordinance of the city. The cause was before the trial court, and is before us, upon the allegations of the petition for the writ and the allegations of the answer thereto, the trial court having sustained a general demurrer to the answer and the answering defendants having elected to stand thereon.
The record discloses that the city of Everett is a city of the first class, operating under a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Race v. CranneyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Lynch v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Washington Paving Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.