Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Race v. Cranney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1902No. 4464PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Island County. — Hon. Geobge C. Hatch, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that the appellant has no appealable interest in said cause. There seems to be nothing in this motion. If a party has sufficient interest to make him a party to an action, he has sufficient interest to appeal should the judgment be against him. The motion is denied.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. The alternative writ was not asked for, but a petition or complaint was filed alleging, in substance, that the petitioners had bought at tax sale the lands described in the petition;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State ex rel. Marsh v. State Board of Land CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Wright v. Commissioners of Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People ex rel. Dinsmore v. Croton Aqueduct BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bolster v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State Ex Rel. Bond v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API