Legal Opinion

Eugster v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 2003No. 21853-8-IIIPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

Today, we consider another dispute involving the public parking garage portion of Spokane’s River Park Square shopping mall. The core issue is whether the superior court erred by issuing a writ of mandamus directing the city of Spokane (City) to abide by an ordinance providing a contingent loan of parking meter revenue to cover garage expense shortfalls. We hold the City has a duty under the ordinance to offer the loan. We agree no material fact issues remained requiring a mandamus trial. Further, we reject contentions seeking to nullify the ordinance centered on alleged violations of the…

2Cases cited121 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Colvin v. InsleeWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. G.A.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API