Legal Opinion

Lynch v. City of North Yakima

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1905No. 5357PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Rudkin, J., entered June 22, 1903, dismissing an action for damages for injuries sustained by a member of a fire department, after sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Appellant sued respondent, a city of the third class, for damages, and in his complaint sets forth two alleged causes of action. In the first he avers that respondent employed one Hauser as chief of its fire department, who had authority to, and did, employ appellant as driver of a team of horses, which respondent furnished to draw the fire engine; that it was part of appellant’s duty to drill said horses “to work to the bell” — that is, to rush from their stalls expeditiously when a fire alarm was sounded; that an “electric whip” is an inexpensive appliance commonly used for thus drilling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ogg v. City of LansingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Jewett v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Nicholson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lawson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Howard v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Cunningham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lakoduk v. CrugerWashington Supreme Court · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API