Legal Opinion

Baker v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1975No. 47496PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The issue presented herein is whether date trial court entered judgment on promissory note and foreclosed mortgage given to secure note, or date of deficiency judgment, is date of judgment for purposes of dormancy statute [12 O.S.1971 § 735],

Defendants Martin and others executed promissory note for $90,000 payable to plaintiffs. To secure payment defendants executed purchase money real estate mortgage.

Defendants defaulted on note and plaintiffs brought action for judgment on note and foreclosure of mortgage. On March 20, 1964, trial court entered judgment against defendants for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert R. Ingerton v. First National Bank and Trust Company of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  2. Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. North v. HaningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API