Legal Opinion

Great Western Bank v. Willmar Poultry Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2010No. 20090071PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Great Western Bank appeals the district court’s summary judgment, holding that Willmar Poultry Company has a valid North Dakota agricultural supplier’s lien with a super-priority interest of $72,356.17 in the proceeds of a sale of turkeys between ABTH, LLP, and Sara Lee Corporation. We conclude that “poults” supplied by Willmar Poultry are “supplies” under North Dakota’s agricultural supplier’s lien statute, N.D.C.C. § 35-31-01, and that Willmar Poultry is entitled to a supplier’s lien. We further conclude that N.D.C.C. § 35-31-03 provides Willmar Poultry with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  5. ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Roseland v. HeraufNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API