Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Roseland v. Herauf
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 2012No. 20120170PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota, through Adams County State’s Attorney Aaron Roseland, petitioned for a supervisory writ directing the district court to withdraw its pretrial order holding N.D.R.Ev. 707 required the State to produce at trial the person who drew Gwen Bohmbach’s blood on the charge of driving under the influence. We conclude this is an appropriate case in which to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction. Because we hold N.D.R.Ev. 707, when construed with N.D.C.C. § 39-20-07, requires the State to produce at trial the individual who drew Bohmbach’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Western Horizons Living Centers v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Madden v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Haag v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.