Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax Commissioner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Amerada Hess Corporation (“Am-erada”), Tioga Gas Plant, Inc. (“Tioga”), Solar Gas, Inc. (“Solar”), and AH 1980 Program, Inc. (“AH”) appealed from a judgment affirming an order of the State Tax Commissioner assessing them more than $3,000,000 in additional back taxes, penalty and interest. We conclude the Commissioner did not err in his interpretation of the applicable tax statutes in assessing the additional taxes, penalty and interest. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Amerada and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tioga, Solar and AH, each conducted business in North Dakota during tax…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Llinois Central Railroad v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. LenckosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Hilton v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Sandberg v. American Family Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FasteenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.