ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] ACUITY appeals from a summary judgment declaring it was obligated under a commercial general liability insurance (“CGL”) policy to indemnify its insured, Burd & Smith Construction, Inc., for Burd & Smith’s responsibility for damages to an apartment building owned by Chad and Rebecca Caillier. We conclude the CGL policy does not provide coverage to repair or replace a defective roof on the apartment building, but does provide coverage for other property damage to the apartment building. We modify the judgment accordingly, and as modified, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The Cailliers…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Jet Line Services, Inc. v. American Employers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. Home Pride Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Trinity Hospitals v. MattsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Essex Insurance v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.