Legal Opinion
State v. Lutz
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 2012No. 20120091PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Travis Trainor Lutz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to the charge of driving under the influence. Because we conclude the State was required to produce at trial the nurse who drew Lutz’s blood, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In September 2011, Lutz was charged with driving under the influence and submitted to a blood draw, which was conducted by a nurse. The State notified Lutz of its intent to introduce an analytical report at trial under N.D.R.Ev. 707. Lutz objected and demanded the State…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. PealerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Madden v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Haag v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Bang, et al. v. Continental ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.