Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1961No. Civ. 24834PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
Plaintiffs, as taxpayers and citizens of the city of Los Angeles, sought by their complaint: (1) to enjoin the city from transferring 27.67 acres of Elysian Park to defendant Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc., and (2) to obtain a declaration that Resolution Number 2250 of the board of recreation and park commissioners of Los Angeles and that Ordinance Number 113933 of Los Angeles (relative to said land) are invalid. Defendants’ motion for a summary judgment was granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The complaint alleged, as a first cause of action, that on October 7, 1957, the City Council of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Ruben v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Gosnell v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Olmstead v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Dryer v. DryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.