Legal Opinion

Dryer v. Dryer

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1964No. Civ. 415PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The plaintiff, James M. Dryer, as administrator of the estate of Nathan H. Dryer, deceased, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, LaVey Louk Dryer. The elder Dryer died on May 6, 1960, leaving three adult sons and a minor daughter aged 13 years. His first wife, Grace, predeceased him on October 1, 1959, after a marriage which lasted for 32 years. Four months later Nathan H. Dryer married the respondent herein, LaVey Louk Dryer, and, during a marriage which lasted only 10 weeks, she was allegedly made the beneficiary of the following property which formerly belonged to him:

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. G & D Holland Construction Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. McCreery v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API