Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Riley

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1955No. Civ. 5203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action for reformation and enforcement as reformed of three instruments—a property settlement agreement and trust indenture, both executed on December 6, 1941, and an agreement terminating a trust executed May 26, 1947. After defendants filed their answer they filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of merit under the provisions of section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. This motion for summary judgment was made upon the grounds that all of the matters set forth in the complaint are res judicata and that all of the matters therein were determined in an action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Dryer v. DryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. One 1964 Chevrolet Corvette ConvertibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. One 1964 Chevrolet Covette ConvertibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API