Hightower v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
The State, through the District Attorney of Dallas County, instituted these proceedings under Art. 637 of the Penal Code, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 637, for the destruction of seven devices commonly known as marble tables, slot machines, or marble slot *328machines, allegedly kept or exhibited for the purpose of gambling, in violation of Art. 619, P.C. J. J. Hightower, alleged to own an interest in all the devices, and Charles Skibos, John Cooper, George Hodges, E. Wright, M. Petroíf, 'C. H. Herbig and Rex Allen, from whose possession, the devices were taken, were named defendants.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Houghton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. George E. Girard, Jr., Paul A. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- City of Fort Worth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Key v. Commissioners Court of Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.