Legal Opinion

Sokolow v. City of Hope

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1953No. L. A. 22812PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeal from an adverse judgment entered upon a directed verdict in their action to recover damages resulting from personal injuries suffered by plaintiff wife 1 when she tripped and fell to the floor. We have concluded that the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor, and that the judgment should be reversed. Purported appeals from the verdict and from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, being from nonappealable orders, must be dismissed. (Sawyer v. Sunset Mut. Life Ins. Co. (1937), 8 Cal.2d 492, 501 [66 P.2d 641].)

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mayfield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. DiGiorgio Furit Corp. v. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial OragnizationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. De La Rosa v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. AFL-CIOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API