Legal Opinion

Blumberg v. M. & T. Incorporated

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1949No. S. F. 17945PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Benjamin and Charlotte Blumberg sued to recover damages for personal injuries which she assertedly sustained when she fell in the lobby of a downtown office building in San Francisco. Their appeal from an adverse judgment challenges the ruling of the trial court granting the property owner’s motion for a nonsuit.

According to the settled statement, about two hours after a dinner with Mr. and Mrs. Melvin Isaacs, the Blumbergs accompanied their friends to see Mr. Isaacs’ office. The accident occurred after they returned to the ground floor. Mrs. Blumberg testified in part: “. . . I remember…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API