Muscatine Lighting Co. v. City of Muscatine
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
M0RLING, J,
Our view on the question of power of the municipality to issue bonds to provide for the cost of extension and enlargement of an existing municipally constructed and owned electric light and power plant disposes of the case, and, therefore, other questions argued will not be discussed.
As will be seen, the defendant city has a newly constructed plant. At the beginning of this litigation, the defendants sought to maintain the proposition that the additional equipment intended to be installed constituted an independent plant, for the installation of which the city might proceed as for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- First National Bank v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Incorporated Town of Sibley v. Ocheyedan Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Mocha v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Brooks v. Incorporated Town of BrooklynSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Swanson v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Baird v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Chitwood v. LanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Mote v. Incorporated Town of CarlisleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Fowler v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.