Legal Opinion

Chitwood v. Lanning

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1934No. 42842PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaussen, J.

The city of Oskaloosa duly established and erected a municipal waterworks plant. In conformity with law, the management of such plant was placed in charge of trustees. Defendants are such trustees. It is proposed to make extensions and improvements to said plant. It is proposed to issue bonds in an amount sufficient to pay for such proposed work, payable only out of the earnings of the plant, which bonds shall be secured by lien upon all net earnings of the waterworks plant and upon only the improvements to be constructed and installed.

Plaintiff and intervener seek to restrain such acts on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Town of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Mote v. Incorporated Town of CarlisleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Muscatine Lighting Co. v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Fowler v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Veldman v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Farrell v. State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Goreham v. Des Moines Metropolitan Area Solid Waste AgencySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API