Legal Opinion

Mocha v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The trial court ruled that the city, in establishing and maintaining the bathing, beach, was acting in a governmental, and not in its corporate or proprietary, capacity, and was, therefore, not liable for the negligence of its officers or employees occurring therein. The correctness of this ruling is the only question for review here. ...

The distinction between those functions of a municipality which are • governmental in their nature _ and those which are corporate or proprietary has been so. fully considered in recent cases as to render further discussion superfluous. Hensley v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Rowley v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Alder v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Smith v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Welsh v. DarlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Knote v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Vaughn v. City of AlcoaTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API