Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Brannan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1891No. 13603PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This is a contest for the purchase of land from the state, instituted in the land-office. The court awarded the land to plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The land belongs to the class designated swamp-land, title to which was acquired by the state under act of Congress approved September 28, 1850. The plaintiff was an actual Settler upon the land, and the defendant was not. Under the finding of the court, that the land in controversy was suitable for cultivation, this became the turning-point in the case, — the court holding that section 3, article 17, of the state constitution was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manley v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McIntyre v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Polk v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Robinson v. EberhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Albert v. HoblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dewar v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Goldberg v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API