Albert v. Hobler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. A. R. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action is prosecuted to determine the conflicting claims of plaintiff and defendant as to their respective rights to purchase from the state of California certain school lands, viz., the northeast quarter of section 8, township 25 south, range 26 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, and arises upon a contest initiated in the office of the surveyor general of said *399state, and by him referred to the superior court of Kern county for trial.
Findings and judgment went in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manley v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fulton v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jacobs v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. EberhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Boggs v. GaneardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Sanford v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906