Dewar v. Ruiz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
— This action was brought by respondent against Ruiz, defendant, to determine the rights between said parties to purchase certain swamp and overflowed land. Gardner intervened as successor in interest to Ruiz. Judgment went in the lower court in favor of respondent and against the defendant and intervener, and the latter appeals.
1. There was no error committed in refusing to admit in evidence the application of defendant Ruiz to purchase, and subsequent papers dependent upon it, because, waiving all other objections, it appeared, and is not contradicted, the said application was made before *387se…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fulton v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Buchanan v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wren v. ManganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Polk v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McGill v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918