Robinson v. Eberhart
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Collier & Carnahan, Washington & Carter, and Victor E. Shaw, for Appellant. E. A. Meserve, E. E. Powers, C. F. Holland, Powers & Holland, and D. M. Hammack, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action instituted in the superior court of Riverside County, under an order of reference made by the surveyor-general, to determine the conflicting claims of plaintiff and defendant Eberhart, as to their respective rights to purchase from the state a half-section of state school land, the east half of section 36, township 6 south, range 7 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Johnson has some claim under Eberhart, arising from a contract of sale. The judgment was in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manley v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fulton v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jacobs v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Albert v. HoblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Lyman v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Bowline v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hansen v. D'ArtenayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Cook v. Suburban Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912