Legal Opinion

McKeage MacHinery Co. v. Osborne & Sexton MacHinery Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1936No. Appeal, 171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This Avas an action begun by foreign attachment to recover the purchase price of a second-hand machine knoAvn as a Mattison Electric Moulder, sold by plaintiff to the defendant.

Plaintiff’s statement averred that on or about April 3, 1930, the defendant, through its president, James J. Sexton, offered verbally to purchase from plaintiff a certain machine known as a “Ho. 225 Mattison Electric Moulder” etc. for the price of $1400, which offer the plaintiff, through its president, B. F. McKeage, orally accepted, agreeing to deliver the machine f. o. b. Philadelphia, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill & MacMillan, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Madison-Kipp Corp. v. Price Battery Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Deacon v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Montgomery Foundry & Fittings Co. v. Hall Planetary Thread Milling Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Montgomery F. F. Co. v. hallp.T.M.M.co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pantano v. Zamer Motor Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Wilson v. MalenockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. J.J. Pocock, Inc., to Use v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Rumsey Electric Co. v. Heat Seal-It Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API