Legal Opinion

Pantano v. Zamer Motor Sales Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This action of assumpsit was brought to recover the sum of $1,550, averred to be the agreed value of a used car transferred by the plaintiff to the defendant. After a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,200, and defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial were refused, judgment was entered on the verdict and this appeal was taken by the defendant.

Belle Motor Company, a partnership, was the Kaiser-Frazer automobile dealer for Johnstown from 1946 to September of 1949. In July of 1949 the plaintiff arranged to purchase a 1951 Frazer automobile…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ballentine v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  2. Weintraub AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Tolomeo v. Harmony Short Line Motor Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Goodwin v. HecklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. First Valley Bank v. Ramonat (In Re Ramonat)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. ZaengleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API