Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Malenock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1937No. Appeal, 269PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The dispute in this case was whether the defendant, an auto-body repairman who rebuilt plaintiff’s car, had a common law lien for the cost of the repairs, or, by contract, waived his lien and was therefore liable to plaintiff in an action of trespass for converting the car through refusing to deliver it to him until the repair bill was paid.

The back of plaintiff’s 1930 Chevrolet car was damaged on April 14, 1936, as the result of a collision with a car owned by one Brock. Brock promised plaintiff to pay for the repairs to plaintiff’s car, and, through his wife, told…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meitner v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Eichman v. HerskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Hoover v. EplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Mathias v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  5. Neiler & Warren v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parks v. Mr. FordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. RichmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. MatteoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Parks v. " MR. FORD"District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Associates Financial Services Co. v. O'DellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API