Legal Opinion

Montgomery F. F. Co. v. hallp.T.M.M.co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued December 3, 1924. Answering an inquiry from plaintiff, defendant wrote that it would sell to plaintiff two complete heads of its patented No. 3 Planetary Thread Milling Machine, for $1,600 each, stating that "all the working parts of the machine are practically in the heads." Twelve days later plaintiff Wrote, "Ship via our truck to us . . . . . . two No. 3 Hall Planetary Heads with sprocket, chain and weight, price $1,600 each." Evidently this resulted in negotiations between the parties as to what was intended to be included in the offer, but the details thereof were exclude by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolverine Glass Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Keck v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madison-Kipp Corp. v. Price Battery Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. McKeage MacHinery Co. v. Osborne & Sexton MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Lewis v. FOOD MACHINERY AND CHEMICAL CORP., JOHN BEAN DIV.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
  4. American Paper & Pulp Co., Inc. v. Maurice Denenberg, Individually and Trading as Denny Paper & Board Co., (Lansdowne Paper Mill, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Cleveland Wrecking Co. of Cincinnati v. Federal Deposit Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API