Deacon v. Hendricks
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 369, Oct;- T., 1915, by' plaintiff,' from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., May T., 1915, No. 423, for defendant on trial by the court without a jury in case of John R. Deacon v. ■Edith S. Hendricks. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Bonniwell, J. Error assigned was the judgment of the court in favor of the defendant for $496.80.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
On the trial in the court below, which was had without a jury, there were no requests for any finding of fact, and the record does not disclose an exception to the ruling of the court, either to the admission or exclusion of evidence. The finding is, the conclusion of the trial judge, based on the testimony presented, and we follow the rule laid down in Herring v. Weinroth, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, and in Peoples v. Philadelphia, 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 553, in which we held, “If the assignments of error are not based on anything brought into the record by bill of exception, the only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herring v. WeinrothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Peoples v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Cohen v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Robinson Electrical Co. v. Capitol Trucking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Emerson C. Custis & Co. v. Tradesmans National Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- McKeage MacHinery Co. v. Osborne & Sexton MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.