Legal Opinion

Longview Co. v. Lynn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1940No. 27834PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs, residents and taxpayers of the city of Longview, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly interested, instituted this action for the purpose of obtaining a judgment declaring and establishing the status and legal rights of the parties to this action, with regard to certain local improvement district bonds issued by the city of Longview. The city of Longview, together with its mayor and treasurer, were named as defendants, together with J. J. Lynn, J. H. Edwards, and F. J. Zeithamel, Jr., as members of a bondholders protective committee, and Henry G. Niblett, who,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of New Whatcom v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Preuss v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. Hardy v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Graffell v. HoneysuckleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Varsolona v. Breen Capital Services Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API