Legal Opinion

Hallahan v. City of Port Angeles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1931No. 22979. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to restrain the collection of a tax. To the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint, refusing to plead further, and judgment dismissing the action was entered, from which he appeals.

The respondent city of Port Angeles is a city of the third class. The appellant is a resident and taxpayer of the city, and he brought this action on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated. August 29, 1928, the respondent, acting by reason of the requirements of Rem. 1927 Sup., §§ 9351-1 et seq., title LX,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Longview Co. v. LynnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kelly v. City of SunnysideWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API